Search for Variation information by Variation ID:

Please input a variation ID (e.g., vg0722097923 , STR0500036000 ).

Detailed information for vg0919120663:

Variant ID: vg0919120663 (JBrowse)Variation Type: INDEL
Chromosome: chr09Position: 19120663
Reference Allele: AAlternative Allele: AAG
Primary Allele: AAGSecondary Allele: A

Inferred Ancestral Allele : A (evidence from allele frequency in Oryza rufipogon: A: 1.00, others allele: 0.00, population size: 281. )

Flanking Sequence (100 bp) in Reference Genome:


GATACATTCATGAATAATGTTCTCAGGGTTTTTGTCAGTAATTCTTGAACAAATTTGTTCAGTTTCTAGATTGGCTAGGCATAAGCAGACTGGAGTTAGA[A/AAG]
AGAGAGGAGTGGAGAGGCAACATACAGGACAAGCACTCGGCGTCATCGTCGGCATCAATGCCCGGAGCCCCACCGGCGTTGTACACCACCTCGCCATGCT

Reverse complement sequence

AGCATGGCGAGGTGGTGTACAACGCCGGTGGGGCTCCGGGCATTGATGCCGACGATGACGCCGAGTGCTTGTCCTGTATGTTGCCTCTCCACTCCTCTCT[T/CTT]
TCTAACTCCAGTCTGCTTATGCCTAGCCAATCTAGAAACTGAACAAATTTGTTCAAGAATTACTGACAAAAACCCTGAGAACATTATTCATGAATGTATC

Allele Frequencies:

Populations Population SizeFrequency of AAG(primary allele) Frequency of A(secondary allele) Frequency of N Frequency of DEL Frequency of others Allele
All  4726 74.50% 25.30% 0.23% 0.00% NA
All Indica  2759 97.90% 1.90% 0.18% 0.00% NA
All Japonica  1512 26.90% 72.90% 0.20% 0.00% NA
Aus  269 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica I  595 97.10% 2.40% 0.50% 0.00% NA
Indica II  465 96.30% 3.40% 0.22% 0.00% NA
Indica III  913 99.80% 0.10% 0.11% 0.00% NA
Indica Intermediate  786 97.20% 2.80% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Temperate Japonica  767 34.40% 65.30% 0.26% 0.00% NA
Tropical Japonica  504 4.60% 95.20% 0.20% 0.00% NA
Japonica Intermediate  241 49.80% 50.20% 0.00% 0.00% NA
VI/Aromatic  96 95.80% 4.20% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Intermediate  90 56.70% 40.00% 3.33% 0.00% NA

Allele Effect:

Var ID Var Locus snpEff Annotation CooVar Annotation Chromatin Accessibility Score PolyPhen-2 Effect PolyPhen-2 Score SIFT Effect SIFT Score
vg0919120663 A -> AAG LOC_Os09g32020.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 2647.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:85.807; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.576 N N N N
vg0919120663 A -> AAG LOC_Os09g32025.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 1525.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:85.807; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.576 N N N N
vg0919120663 A -> AAG LOC_Os09g32040.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 1162.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:85.807; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.576 N N N N
vg0919120663 A -> AAG LOC_Os09g32050.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 4726.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:85.807; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.576 N N N N
vg0919120663 A -> AAG LOC_Os09g32050.2 downstream_gene_variant ; 4737.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:85.807; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.576 N N N N
vg0919120663 A -> AAG LOC_Os09g32030.1 intron_variant ; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:85.807; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.576 N N N N

Effects Predicted by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

For each variant, we constructed two sequences that contain the variation site and the sequence around it, differing only in the variation site. We then used Basenji to predict the chromatin accessibility of each tissue for the two sequences, respectively, and scored the effect of the variant by comparing the changes in chromatin accessibility corresponding to the two genotypes in the 1 kb region around the variation site. The effect score was defined as the logarithmic ratio of the predicted chromatin accessibility of the alternative genotype to the value of the reference genotype.

Var ID Ref Alt Root (RT) Young Leaf (YL) Flag Leaf (FL) Young Panicle (YP) Lemma & Palea (LP) Stamen & Pistil (SP)
vg0919120663 A AAG 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.09