Search for Variation information by Variation ID:

Please input a variation ID (e.g., vg0722097923 , STR0500036000 ).

Detailed information for vg0517888926:

Variant ID: vg0517888926 (JBrowse)Variation Type: INDEL
Chromosome: chr05Position: 17888926
Reference Allele: TGGAAlternative Allele: T,TGGAGGAGGA,TGGAGGA
Primary Allele: TGGASecondary Allele: T

Inferred Ancestral Allele: Not determined.

Flanking Sequence (100 bp) in Reference Genome:


GAGCGATCTTTGTCCGAATCGGGAGCTAATCTATCTACCCCGCTGCCAAGAAGAAGCGGCGGCGCTTTAAAGAGGAGAGGGGAGGGGGAGTGGACCGGGG[TGGA/T,TGGAGGAGGA,TGGAGGA]
GGAGGAGGAGGAGGAGCGCCACACCCACACCCACATGGAGATGGTAAGATAGCGGGGGGTTTGTCGAAACATGGATTCGGCAATAATAAAACGGGGTAGC

Reverse complement sequence

GCTACCCCGTTTTATTATTGCCGAATCCATGTTTCGACAAACCCCCCGCTATCTTACCATCTCCATGTGGGTGTGGGTGTGGCGCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCC[TCCA/A,TCCTCCTCCA,TCCTCCA]
CCCCGGTCCACTCCCCCTCCCCTCTCCTCTTTAAAGCGCCGCCGCTTCTTCTTGGCAGCGGGGTAGATAGATTAGCTCCCGATTCGGACAAAGATCGCTC

Allele Frequencies:

Populations Population SizeFrequency of TGGA(primary allele) Frequency of T(secondary allele) Frequency of N Frequency of DEL Frequency of others Allele
All  4726 96.00% 3.70% 0.28% 0.00% TGGAGGAGGA: 0.04%; TGGAGGA: 0.02%
All Indica  2759 99.20% 0.70% 0.07% 0.00% NA
All Japonica  1512 99.70% 0.00% 0.07% 0.00% TGGAGGAGGA: 0.13%; TGGAGGA: 0.07%
Aus  269 39.80% 56.50% 3.72% 0.00% NA
Indica I  595 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica II  465 99.40% 0.40% 0.22% 0.00% NA
Indica III  913 98.80% 1.20% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica Intermediate  786 99.10% 0.80% 0.13% 0.00% NA
Temperate Japonica  767 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Tropical Japonica  504 99.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% TGGAGGAGGA: 0.40%; TGGAGGA: 0.20%
Japonica Intermediate  241 99.60% 0.00% 0.41% 0.00% NA
VI/Aromatic  96 99.00% 1.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Intermediate  90 97.80% 2.20% 0.00% 0.00% NA

Allele Effect:

Var ID Var Locus snpEff Annotation CooVar Annotation Chromatin Accessibility Score PolyPhen-2 Effect PolyPhen-2 Score SIFT Effect SIFT Score
vg0517888926 TGGA -> T LOC_Os05g30820.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 287.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N
vg0517888926 TGGA -> T LOC_Os05g30820.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 287.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N
vg0517888926 TGGA -> T LOC_Os05g30830.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 3042.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N
vg0517888926 TGGA -> TGGAGGAGGA LOC_Os05g30820.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 290.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N
vg0517888926 TGGA -> TGGAGGAGGA LOC_Os05g30820.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 290.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N
vg0517888926 TGGA -> TGGAGGAGGA LOC_Os05g30830.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 3039.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N
vg0517888926 TGGA -> TGGAGGA LOC_Os05g30820.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 290.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N
vg0517888926 TGGA -> TGGAGGA LOC_Os05g30820.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 290.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N
vg0517888926 TGGA -> TGGAGGA LOC_Os05g30830.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 3039.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:89.1; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 panicle, score: 96.294 N N N N

Effects Predicted by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

For each variant, we constructed two sequences that contain the variation site and the sequence around it, differing only in the variation site. We then used Basenji to predict the chromatin accessibility of each tissue for the two sequences, respectively, and scored the effect of the variant by comparing the changes in chromatin accessibility corresponding to the two genotypes in the 1 kb region around the variation site. The effect score was defined as the logarithmic ratio of the predicted chromatin accessibility of the alternative genotype to the value of the reference genotype.

Var ID Ref Alt Root (RT) Young Leaf (YL) Flag Leaf (FL) Young Panicle (YP) Lemma & Palea (LP) Stamen & Pistil (SP)
vg0517888926 TGGA T 0.02 -0.04 -0.08 0.05 0.03 -0.02
vg0517888926 TGGA TGGAG* -0.1 -0.02 -0.05 -0.13 -0.14 -0.19