Search for Variation information by Variation ID:

Please input a variation ID (e.g., vg0722097923 , STR0500036000 ).

Detailed information for vg0228811970:

Variant ID: vg0228811970 (JBrowse)Variation Type: SNP
Chromosome: chr02Position: 28811970
Reference Allele: AAlternative Allele: G,T
Primary Allele: ASecondary Allele: G

Inferred Ancestral Allele : A (evidence from allele frequency in Oryza rufipogon: A: 1.00, others allele: 0.00, population size: 322. )

Flanking Sequence (100 bp) in Reference Genome:


ACTAATGTAAAATTTGTGGGGTAAAGGCTCTGAATAATCGTAGCTAATCAATCATGTCTAGATCTGAATATCAGAATATATACACTGTATGAGTATTCGT[A/G,T]
CCTGCACTCTAAACGACTAAAGCAAAAGCATTATCAAGTCTTGCAACAGTCCAACCACGTTGAACTTCTGGTCATTTTGTAGTAGAAAAGAATCCTTCGT

Reverse complement sequence

ACGAAGGATTCTTTTCTACTACAAAATGACCAGAAGTTCAACGTGGTTGGACTGTTGCAAGACTTGATAATGCTTTTGCTTTAGTCGTTTAGAGTGCAGG[T/C,A]
ACGAATACTCATACAGTGTATATATTCTGATATTCAGATCTAGACATGATTGATTAGCTACGATTATTCAGAGCCTTTACCCCACAAATTTTACATTAGT

Allele Frequencies:

Populations Population SizeFrequency of A(primary allele) Frequency of G(secondary allele) Frequency of N Frequency of DEL Frequency of others Allele
All  4726 98.40% 1.50% 0.02% 0.00% T: 0.02%
All Indica  2759 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% T: 0.04%
All Japonica  1512 95.20% 4.70% 0.07% 0.00% NA
Aus  269 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica I  595 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica II  465 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica III  913 99.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% T: 0.11%
Indica Intermediate  786 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Temperate Japonica  767 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Tropical Japonica  504 86.10% 13.70% 0.20% 0.00% NA
Japonica Intermediate  241 99.20% 0.80% 0.00% 0.00% NA
VI/Aromatic  96 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Intermediate  90 98.90% 1.10% 0.00% 0.00% NA

Allele Effect:

Var ID Var Locus snpEff Annotation CooVar Annotation Chromatin Accessibility Score PolyPhen-2 Effect PolyPhen-2 Score SIFT Effect SIFT Score
vg0228811970 A -> G LOC_Os02g47190.1 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 216.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:78.929; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 95.215 N N N N
vg0228811970 A -> G LOC_Os02g47200.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 421.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:78.929; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 95.215 N N N N
vg0228811970 A -> G LOC_Os02g47210.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 3496.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:78.929; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 95.215 N N N N
vg0228811970 A -> T LOC_Os02g47190.1 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 216.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:78.929; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 95.215 N N N N
vg0228811970 A -> T LOC_Os02g47200.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 421.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:78.929; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 95.215 N N N N
vg0228811970 A -> T LOC_Os02g47210.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 3496.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:78.929; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 95.215 N N N N

Effects Predicted by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

For each variant, we constructed two sequences that contain the variation site and the sequence around it, differing only in the variation site. We then used Basenji to predict the chromatin accessibility of each tissue for the two sequences, respectively, and scored the effect of the variant by comparing the changes in chromatin accessibility corresponding to the two genotypes in the 1 kb region around the variation site. The effect score was defined as the logarithmic ratio of the predicted chromatin accessibility of the alternative genotype to the value of the reference genotype.

Var ID Ref Alt Root (RT) Young Leaf (YL) Flag Leaf (FL) Young Panicle (YP) Lemma & Palea (LP) Stamen & Pistil (SP)
vg0228811970 A G -0.04 -0.04 -0.01 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01
vg0228811970 A T -0.02 -0.03 -0.01 -0.04 -0.03 -0.01