Search for Variation information by Variation ID:

Please input a variation ID (e.g., vg0722097923 , STR0500036000 ).

Detailed information for vg0228081723:

Variant ID: vg0228081723 (JBrowse)Variation Type: INDEL
Chromosome: chr02Position: 28081723
Reference Allele: TGGAlternative Allele: TG,TGGGG,TGGG,TGGGGG,TGGGGGG,T
Primary Allele: TGGSecondary Allele: TGGGG

Inferred Ancestral Allele: Not determined.

Flanking Sequence (100 bp) in Reference Genome:


AATCGAAAAATAGAACGATTTGTAGTTCAATTATACCTGTCGTTGCACTTGCACCTCACCAGAAGAATCACAGATTGCAAGTGAAATTAAATCTGGGAAT[TGG/TG,TGGGG,TGGG,TGGGGG,TGGGGGG,T]
GGGGGGGTTCCGGGGTTAATCACCACCACACATCCCCCGAGACCAGCCGAAAACAAAGAGCAGATTGCCCCAATTTAGTGCAAGAATTGGGCTTATTATG

Reverse complement sequence

CATAATAAGCCCAATTCTTGCACTAAATTGGGGCAATCTGCTCTTTGTTTTCGGCTGGTCTCGGGGGATGTGTGGTGGTGATTAACCCCGGAACCCCCCC[CCA/CA,CCCCA,CCCA,CCCCCA,CCCCCCA,A]
ATTCCCAGATTTAATTTCACTTGCAATCTGTGATTCTTCTGGTGAGGTGCAAGTGCAACGACAGGTATAATTGAACTACAAATCGTTCTATTTTTCGATT

Allele Frequencies:

Populations Population SizeFrequency of TGG(primary allele) Frequency of TGGGG(secondary allele) Frequency of N Frequency of DEL Frequency of others Allele
All  4726 19.40% 7.60% 26.81% 38.87% TGGG: 4.95%; TG: 1.16%; TGGGGG: 0.99%; TGGGGGG: 0.13%; T: 0.06%
All Indica  2759 7.40% 1.40% 27.11% 60.71% TGGG: 1.67%; TG: 1.52%; TGGGGGG: 0.07%; TGGGGG: 0.07%; T: 0.04%
All Japonica  1512 30.40% 20.30% 27.71% 6.88% TGGG: 11.77%; TGGGGG: 2.78%; TGGGGGG: 0.20%
Aus  269 53.20% 0.00% 26.39% 14.50% TG: 4.46%; TGGG: 1.49%
Indica I  595 4.50% 0.20% 28.91% 65.21% TG: 0.84%; TGGGGGG: 0.17%; TGGGGG: 0.17%
Indica II  465 5.40% 0.60% 28.60% 64.73% TGGG: 0.43%; TGGGGGG: 0.22%
Indica III  913 8.90% 1.60% 22.45% 59.58% TGGG: 4.27%; TG: 3.07%; TGGGGG: 0.11%
Indica Intermediate  786 9.00% 2.50% 30.28% 56.23% TG: 1.15%; TGGG: 0.64%; T: 0.13%
Temperate Japonica  767 27.80% 20.90% 37.68% 6.26% TGGG: 4.56%; TGGGGG: 2.48%; TGGGGGG: 0.39%
Tropical Japonica  504 39.90% 22.20% 14.09% 8.13% TGGG: 12.30%; TGGGGG: 3.37%
Japonica Intermediate  241 18.70% 14.50% 24.48% 6.22% TGGG: 33.61%; TGGGGG: 2.49%
VI/Aromatic  96 84.40% 3.10% 6.25% 1.04% TGGG: 3.12%; TGGGGG: 2.08%
Intermediate  90 33.30% 12.20% 25.56% 20.00% TGGG: 3.33%; T: 2.22%; TGGGGG: 1.11%; TGGGGGG: 1.11%; TG: 1.11%

Allele Effect:

Var ID Var Locus snpEff Annotation CooVar Annotation Chromatin Accessibility Score PolyPhen-2 Effect PolyPhen-2 Score SIFT Effect SIFT Score
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGGG LOC_Os02g46080.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 249.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGGG LOC_Os02g46080.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 249.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGGG LOC_Os02g46090.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 4655.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> DEL N N silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGG LOC_Os02g46080.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 249.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGG LOC_Os02g46080.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 249.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGG LOC_Os02g46090.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 4655.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TG LOC_Os02g46080.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 248.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TG LOC_Os02g46080.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 248.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TG LOC_Os02g46090.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 4656.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGG LOC_Os02g46080.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 249.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGG LOC_Os02g46080.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 249.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGG LOC_Os02g46090.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 4655.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> T LOC_Os02g46080.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 247.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> T LOC_Os02g46080.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 247.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> T LOC_Os02g46090.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 4657.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGGGG LOC_Os02g46080.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 249.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGGGG LOC_Os02g46080.2 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 249.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N
vg0228081723 TGG -> TGGGGGG LOC_Os02g46090.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 4655.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:97.686; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 flower, score: 98.894 N N N N

Effects Predicted by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

For each variant, we constructed two sequences that contain the variation site and the sequence around it, differing only in the variation site. We then used Basenji to predict the chromatin accessibility of each tissue for the two sequences, respectively, and scored the effect of the variant by comparing the changes in chromatin accessibility corresponding to the two genotypes in the 1 kb region around the variation site. The effect score was defined as the logarithmic ratio of the predicted chromatin accessibility of the alternative genotype to the value of the reference genotype.

Var ID Ref Alt Root (RT) Young Leaf (YL) Flag Leaf (FL) Young Panicle (YP) Lemma & Palea (LP) Stamen & Pistil (SP)
vg0228081723 TGG T -0.03 0.07 0.07 -0.04 0.06 0.15
vg0228081723 TGG TG -0.11 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.02 0.04
vg0228081723 TGG TGGG -0.09 0.13 0.08 0.0 0.01 0.04
vg0228081723 TGG TGGGG -0.1 0.09 0.08 0.0 0.01 0.06
vg0228081723 TGG TGGGG* -0.05 0.03 0.0 0.04 0.04 0.08