Search for Variation information by Variation ID:

Please input a variation ID (e.g., vg0722097923 , STR0500036000 ).

Detailed information for vg0137837996:

Variant ID: vg0137837996 (JBrowse)Variation Type: INDEL
Chromosome: chr01Position: 37837996
Reference Allele: AAlternative Allele: AC
Primary Allele: ASecondary Allele: AC

Inferred Ancestral Allele: Not determined.

Flanking Sequence (100 bp) in Reference Genome:


GTTTTTTCCCTGAATAAGCCAACCAAGTATGTAAGTATGTATAATCTTAGGACGTGTTCACTTTGATGCCATTTTAACCTTACCAAATTTTAGTAAAGTT[A/AC]
AAAAAAAAATAGCTACATTTAGTTTGTTATCAAATTTTGGTAACTGTATAAGAAATTCTACTAAAATTTTGGCAAGTTGCCAAAATTTTAGCAACTATGC

Reverse complement sequence

GCATAGTTGCTAAAATTTTGGCAACTTGCCAAAATTTTAGTAGAATTTCTTATACAGTTACCAAAATTTGATAACAAACTAAATGTAGCTATTTTTTTTT[T/GT]
AACTTTACTAAAATTTGGTAAGGTTAAAATGGCATCAAAGTGAACACGTCCTAAGATTATACATACTTACATACTTGGTTGGCTTATTCAGGGAAAAAAC

Allele Frequencies:

Populations Population SizeFrequency of A(primary allele) Frequency of AC(secondary allele) Frequency of N Frequency of DEL Frequency of others Allele
All  4726 36.00% 0.10% 1.06% 62.89% NA
All Indica  2759 3.40% 0.10% 0.91% 95.58% NA
All Japonica  1512 96.10% 0.00% 0.53% 3.37% NA
Aus  269 2.60% 0.00% 5.95% 91.45% NA
Indica I  595 1.50% 0.00% 0.84% 97.65% NA
Indica II  465 1.90% 0.00% 0.86% 97.20% NA
Indica III  913 2.70% 0.10% 0.88% 96.28% NA
Indica Intermediate  786 6.50% 0.30% 1.02% 92.24% NA
Temperate Japonica  767 97.70% 0.00% 0.26% 2.09% NA
Tropical Japonica  504 97.60% 0.00% 0.00% 2.38% NA
Japonica Intermediate  241 88.00% 0.00% 2.49% 9.54% NA
VI/Aromatic  96 97.90% 0.00% 0.00% 2.08% NA
Intermediate  90 56.70% 2.20% 1.11% 40.00% NA

Allele Effect:

Var ID Var Locus snpEff Annotation CooVar Annotation Chromatin Accessibility Score PolyPhen-2 Effect PolyPhen-2 Score SIFT Effect SIFT Score
vg0137837996 A -> AC LOC_Os01g65200.3 downstream_gene_variant ; 1071.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:51.408; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.463 N N N N
vg0137837996 A -> AC LOC_Os01g65200.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 1071.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:51.408; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.463 N N N N
vg0137837996 A -> AC LOC_Os01g65200.2 downstream_gene_variant ; 1071.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:51.408; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.463 N N N N
vg0137837996 A -> AC LOC_Os01g65210.1 intron_variant ; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:51.408; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.463 N N N N
vg0137837996 A -> DEL N N silent_mutation Average:51.408; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flower, score: 91.463 N N N N

Effects Predicted by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

For each variant, we constructed two sequences that contain the variation site and the sequence around it, differing only in the variation site. We then used Basenji to predict the chromatin accessibility of each tissue for the two sequences, respectively, and scored the effect of the variant by comparing the changes in chromatin accessibility corresponding to the two genotypes in the 1 kb region around the variation site. The effect score was defined as the logarithmic ratio of the predicted chromatin accessibility of the alternative genotype to the value of the reference genotype.

Var ID Ref Alt Root (RT) Young Leaf (YL) Flag Leaf (FL) Young Panicle (YP) Lemma & Palea (LP) Stamen & Pistil (SP)
vg0137837996 A AC -0.31 -0.11 0.03 -0.02 0.01 0.14