Search for Variation information by Variation ID:

Please input a variation ID (e.g., vg0722097923 , STR0500036000 ).

Detailed information for vg0135924593:

Variant ID: vg0135924593 (JBrowse)Variation Type: INDEL
Chromosome: chr01Position: 35924593
Reference Allele: CTTAlternative Allele: CTTT,CT,C,CTTTT
Primary Allele: CTTSecondary Allele: CTTT

Inferred Ancestral Allele: Not determined.

Flanking Sequence (100 bp) in Reference Genome:


AAATATAGTTGTAAAACATTTTCCAGCAGATTTCAAATACTCAGTTTGTCAAAGAAGATATTGTAGCAGCCAATAAGATGTTATCAGACCAAATAACAGT[CTT/CTTT,CT,C,CTTTT]
TTTTTTTGCCAGAAGATAACTTTTGAGTAATGAGCCTTTATAGAAAGAAGAAACAAGCAATAGATGAATACAATCATCACATCACTAAAGTTTGATAAAG

Reverse complement sequence

CTTTATCAAACTTTAGTGATGTGATGATTGTATTCATCTATTGCTTGTTTCTTCTTTCTATAAAGGCTCATTACTCAAAAGTTATCTTCTGGCAAAAAAA[AAG/AAAG,AG,G,AAAAG]
ACTGTTATTTGGTCTGATAACATCTTATTGGCTGCTACAATATCTTCTTTGACAAACTGAGTATTTGAAATCTGCTGGAAAATGTTTTACAACTATATTT

Allele Frequencies:

Populations Population SizeFrequency of CTT(primary allele) Frequency of CTTT(secondary allele) Frequency of N Frequency of DEL Frequency of others Allele
All  4726 98.00% 1.60% 0.19% 0.00% CTTTT: 0.08%; C: 0.04%; CT: 0.02%
All Indica  2759 99.80% 0.10% 0.04% 0.00% NA
All Japonica  1512 99.30% 0.20% 0.33% 0.00% C: 0.13%
Aus  269 99.60% 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica I  595 99.80% 0.00% 0.17% 0.00% NA
Indica II  465 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica III  913 99.90% 0.10% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Indica Intermediate  786 99.60% 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% NA
Temperate Japonica  767 99.50% 0.10% 0.13% 0.00% C: 0.26%
Tropical Japonica  504 99.60% 0.00% 0.40% 0.00% NA
Japonica Intermediate  241 98.30% 0.80% 0.83% 0.00% NA
VI/Aromatic  96 27.10% 65.60% 3.12% 0.00% CTTTT: 4.17%
Intermediate  90 92.20% 6.70% 0.00% 0.00% CT: 1.11%

Allele Effect:

Var ID Var Locus snpEff Annotation CooVar Annotation Chromatin Accessibility Score PolyPhen-2 Effect PolyPhen-2 Score SIFT Effect SIFT Score
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTTT LOC_Os01g62080.1 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 1099.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTTT LOC_Os01g62080.2 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 1099.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTTT LOC_Os01g62070.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 2627.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTTT LOC_Os01g62070.2 upstream_gene_variant ; 2627.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTTT LOC_Os01g62070.3 upstream_gene_variant ; 2627.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTT LOC_Os01g62080.1 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 1099.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTT LOC_Os01g62080.2 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 1099.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTT LOC_Os01g62070.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 2627.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTT LOC_Os01g62070.2 upstream_gene_variant ; 2627.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CTTT LOC_Os01g62070.3 upstream_gene_variant ; 2627.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> C LOC_Os01g62080.1 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 1100.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> C LOC_Os01g62080.2 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 1100.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> C LOC_Os01g62070.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 2625.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> C LOC_Os01g62070.2 upstream_gene_variant ; 2625.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> C LOC_Os01g62070.3 upstream_gene_variant ; 2625.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CT LOC_Os01g62080.1 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 1100.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CT LOC_Os01g62080.2 3_prime_UTR_variant ; 1100.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CT LOC_Os01g62070.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 2626.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CT LOC_Os01g62070.2 upstream_gene_variant ; 2626.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N
vg0135924593 CTT -> CT LOC_Os01g62070.3 upstream_gene_variant ; 2626.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:61.415; most accessible tissue: Minghui63 flag leaf, score: 87.461 N N N N

Effects Predicted by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

For each variant, we constructed two sequences that contain the variation site and the sequence around it, differing only in the variation site. We then used Basenji to predict the chromatin accessibility of each tissue for the two sequences, respectively, and scored the effect of the variant by comparing the changes in chromatin accessibility corresponding to the two genotypes in the 1 kb region around the variation site. The effect score was defined as the logarithmic ratio of the predicted chromatin accessibility of the alternative genotype to the value of the reference genotype.

Var ID Ref Alt Root (RT) Young Leaf (YL) Flag Leaf (FL) Young Panicle (YP) Lemma & Palea (LP) Stamen & Pistil (SP)
vg0135924593 CTT C -0.31 -0.25 -0.29 -0.18 -0.2 -0.21
vg0135924593 CTT CT -0.12 -0.19 -0.22 -0.09 -0.12 -0.12
vg0135924593 CTT CTTT -0.1 -0.04 -0.07 -0.02 -0.02 0.02
vg0135924593 CTT CTTTT -0.02 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.03 0.01