Search for Variation information by Variation ID:

Please input a variation ID (e.g., vg0722097923 , STR0500036000 ).

Detailed information for vg0100745529:

Variant ID: vg0100745529 (JBrowse)Variation Type: INDEL
Chromosome: chr01Position: 745529
Reference Allele: TACACACACACACACACACACAlternative Allele: TACACACACAC,TACACACACACAC,TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC,TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC,T,TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
Primary Allele: TACACACACACACACACACA CSecondary Allele: TACACACACACAC

Inferred Ancestral Allele: Not determined.

Flanking Sequence (100 bp) in Reference Genome:


CCCTATTATAGCAAGCAGTGATCATACAGCCTTCCTGCTCTCTCTATTCTGTTTGCAATCCTCTTCACCCTAATTTTCAATGTACCTCTGGCCGTTGCAG[TACACACACACACACACACAC/TACACACACAC,TACACACACACAC,TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC,TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC,T,TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC]
ACACACAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGATGGGTACCATTCTCGCAACAGCCTTCCTGCTCTCTGTTCTCAGCCATGGCAGCTACATAGCCATGGC

Reverse complement sequence

GCCATGGCTATGTAGCTGCCATGGCTGAGAACAGAGAGCAGGAAGGCTGTTGCGAGAATGGTACCCATCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTGTGTGT[GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTA/GTGTGTGTGTA,GTGTGTGTGTGTA,GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTA,GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTA,A,GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTA]
CTGCAACGGCCAGAGGTACATTGAAAATTAGGGTGAAGAGGATTGCAAACAGAATAGAGAGAGCAGGAAGGCTGTATGATCACTGCTTGCTATAATAGGG

Allele Frequencies:

Populations Population SizeFrequency of TACACACACACACACACACA C(primary allele) Frequency of TACACACACACAC(secondary allele) Frequency of N Frequency of DEL Frequency of others Allele
All  4726 53.90% 12.40% 13.16% 4.21% T: 6.33%; TACACACACAC: 3.28%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 3.20%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 2.54%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.99%
All Indica  2759 50.30% 10.10% 13.77% 5.84% T: 10.66%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 5.29%; TACACACACAC: 3.59%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.22%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.18%
All Japonica  1512 53.30% 18.90% 14.29% 2.25% TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 6.61%; TACACACACAC: 2.58%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 1.98%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.07%
Aus  269 91.10% 3.30% 1.49% 0.00% TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 1.12%; TACACACACAC: 1.12%; T: 0.74%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.74%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.37%
Indica I  595 35.00% 31.90% 23.19% 7.06% TACACACACAC: 2.18%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.50%; T: 0.17%
Indica II  465 36.30% 1.90% 21.72% 4.73% T: 15.70%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 13.98%; TACACACACAC: 4.52%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.65%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.43%
Indica III  913 63.70% 1.50% 4.71% 6.57% T: 17.74%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 2.63%; TACACACACAC: 2.63%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.33%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.11%
Indica Intermediate  786 54.60% 8.50% 12.47% 4.71% T: 7.38%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 6.87%; TACACACACAC: 5.22%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.25%
Temperate Japonica  767 76.90% 0.80% 11.60% 0.52% TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 6.52%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 2.22%; TACACACACAC: 1.30%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 0.13%
Tropical Japonica  504 14.90% 52.60% 17.46% 5.56% TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 3.97%; TACACACACAC: 3.97%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 1.59%
Japonica Intermediate  241 58.50% 6.20% 16.18% 0.83% TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 12.45%; TACACACACAC: 3.73%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 2.07%
VI/Aromatic  96 57.30% 3.10% 4.17% 1.04% TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 11.46%; TACACACACAC: 11.46%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 8.33%; T: 2.08%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 1.04%
Intermediate  90 56.70% 11.10% 20.00% 3.33% TACACACACAC: 3.33%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 2.22%; T: 1.11%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 1.11%; TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC: 1.11%

Allele Effect:

Var ID Var Locus snpEff Annotation CooVar Annotation Chromatin Accessibility Score PolyPhen-2 Effect PolyPhen-2 Score SIFT Effect SIFT Score
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> T LOC_Os01g02360.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 26.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> T LOC_Os01g02334.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 3736.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> T LOC_Os01g02350.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 374.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02360.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 26.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02334.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 3746.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02350.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 384.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACA CAC LOC_Os01g02360.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 25.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACA CAC LOC_Os01g02334.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 3756.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACA CAC LOC_Os01g02350.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 394.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02360.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 26.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02334.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 3748.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02350.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 386.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACA C LOC_Os01g02360.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 25.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACA C LOC_Os01g02334.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 3756.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACACACA C LOC_Os01g02350.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 394.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> DEL N N silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02360.1 5_prime_UTR_variant ; 25.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02334.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 3756.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N
vg0100745529 TACACACACACACACACACAC -> TACACACACACACACACACACACACAC LOC_Os01g02350.1 upstream_gene_variant ; 394.0bp to feature; MODIFIER silent_mutation Average:83.52; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 root, score: 92.594 N N N N

Effects Predicted by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

For each variant, we constructed two sequences that contain the variation site and the sequence around it, differing only in the variation site. We then used Basenji to predict the chromatin accessibility of each tissue for the two sequences, respectively, and scored the effect of the variant by comparing the changes in chromatin accessibility corresponding to the two genotypes in the 1 kb region around the variation site. The effect score was defined as the logarithmic ratio of the predicted chromatin accessibility of the alternative genotype to the value of the reference genotype.

Var ID Ref Alt Root (RT) Young Leaf (YL) Flag Leaf (FL) Young Panicle (YP) Lemma & Palea (LP) Stamen & Pistil (SP)
vg0100745529 TACAC* T 0.14 -0.13 -0.05 -0.11 -0.18 -0.25
vg0100745529 TACAC* TACAC* -0.24 -0.01 0.02 -0.26 -0.22 -0.32