Search for Variation information by Variation ID:

Please input a variation ID (e.g., vg0722097923 , STR0500036000 ).

Detailed information for vg0625198293:

Variant ID: vg0625198293 (JBrowse)Variation Type: SNP
Chromosome: chr06Position: 25198293
Reference Allele: AAlternative Allele: T,C
Primary Allele: ASecondary Allele: Unkown

Inferred Ancestral Allele : A (evidence from allele frequency in Oryza rufipogon: A: 0.99, others allele: 0.00, population size: 130. )

Flanking Sequence (100 bp) in Reference Genome:


CGAGCTCATCGCGTCGCGCTCTTCTCGACGAGCTCCAATTTCAGGCAAGATGTCGATGCTGCCGCGCTTCCTCCTCCTCGTCGTGCTGCTCGCGGTGCCG[A/T,C]
TGACGGCGGCGCAGCAGCAGTACGAGGCCAACGCGCAGGGCGACTGCTACACCGACAACGGCAGCTCCGTCCTCGGCTACACCTGCGGCACCGCCGCCTC

Reverse complement sequence

GAGGCGGCGGTGCCGCAGGTGTAGCCGAGGACGGAGCTGCCGTTGTCGGTGTAGCAGTCGCCCTGCGCGTTGGCCTCGTACTGCTGCTGCGCCGCCGTCA[T/A,G]
CGGCACCGCGAGCAGCACGACGAGGAGGAGGAAGCGCGGCAGCATCGACATCTTGCCTGAAATTGGAGCTCGTCGAGAAGAGCGCGACGCGATGAGCTCG

Allele Frequencies:

Populations Population SizeFrequency of A(primary allele) Frequency of Unkown(secondary allele) Frequency of N Frequency of DEL Frequency of others Allele
All  4726 69.60% 0.00% 3.05% 27.34% NA
All Indica  2759 65.10% 0.00% 3.12% 31.79% NA
All Japonica  1512 74.40% 0.00% 2.31% 23.28% NA
Aus  269 77.30% 0.00% 7.81% 14.87% NA
Indica I  595 44.00% 0.00% 3.53% 52.44% NA
Indica II  465 77.40% 0.00% 4.73% 17.85% NA
Indica III  913 71.50% 0.00% 2.63% 25.85% NA
Indica Intermediate  786 66.30% 0.00% 2.42% 31.30% NA
Temperate Japonica  767 88.80% 0.00% 0.26% 10.95% NA
Tropical Japonica  504 63.50% 0.00% 4.37% 32.14% NA
Japonica Intermediate  241 51.50% 0.00% 4.56% 43.98% NA
VI/Aromatic  96 97.90% 0.00% 0.00% 2.08% NA
Intermediate  90 74.40% 0.00% 2.22% 23.33% NA

Allele Effect:

Var ID Var Locus snpEff Annotation CooVar Annotation Chromatin Accessibility Score PolyPhen-2 Effect PolyPhen-2 Score SIFT Effect SIFT Score
vg0625198293 A -> T LOC_Os06g41980.1 missense_variant ; p.Met18Leu; MODERATE N Average:95.236; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 young leaf, score: 97.045 N N N N
vg0625198293 A -> T LOC_Os06g41990.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 1983.0bp to feature; MODIFIER N Average:95.236; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 young leaf, score: 97.045 N N N N
vg0625198293 A -> T LOC_Os06g41990.2 downstream_gene_variant ; 1983.0bp to feature; MODIFIER N Average:95.236; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 young leaf, score: 97.045 N N N N
vg0625198293 A -> C LOC_Os06g41980.1 missense_variant ; p.Met18Leu; MODERATE N Average:95.236; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 young leaf, score: 97.045 N N N N
vg0625198293 A -> C LOC_Os06g41990.1 downstream_gene_variant ; 1983.0bp to feature; MODIFIER N Average:95.236; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 young leaf, score: 97.045 N N N N
vg0625198293 A -> C LOC_Os06g41990.2 downstream_gene_variant ; 1983.0bp to feature; MODIFIER N Average:95.236; most accessible tissue: Zhenshan97 young leaf, score: 97.045 N N N N

Effects Predicted by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

For each variant, we constructed two sequences that contain the variation site and the sequence around it, differing only in the variation site. We then used Basenji to predict the chromatin accessibility of each tissue for the two sequences, respectively, and scored the effect of the variant by comparing the changes in chromatin accessibility corresponding to the two genotypes in the 1 kb region around the variation site. The effect score was defined as the logarithmic ratio of the predicted chromatin accessibility of the alternative genotype to the value of the reference genotype.

Var ID Ref Alt Root (RT) Young Leaf (YL) Flag Leaf (FL) Young Panicle (YP) Lemma & Palea (LP) Stamen & Pistil (SP)
vg0625198293 A C 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.0 0.0
vg0625198293 A T -0.01 0.0 0.01 0.0 -0.01 -0.01